In recent years, society has become increasingly sensitized to issues surrounding mental health. As a result of this attention, there has been an upsurge of public and private sector resources designed to grapple with the multi-dimensional challenges posed by mental illness.
A relatively nascent, but rapidly expanding, body of Canadian and international commentary deals with lost labour productivity (lost output per unit of labour input) in the economy caused by mental health issues. The consensus view amongst those linking mental health with productivity is that society is facing a large and growing problem. And, consequently, it is deemed to be worth devoting significant public and private sector resources to treating the mental illnesses that are serving as a drag on productivity in the workforce and in the economy as a whole. The precise magnitude of the productivity shortfall remains uncertain because of the various methodologies employed and the different populations assessed over multiple time-periods that are covered in individual studies.
This paper seeks to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that lost productivity attributable to mental health challenges is considerable in magnitude, what in the private sector would be labelled ‘material’, and has indeed been increasing in Canada and elsewhere. What’s more, traditional approaches to dissecting the individual components of productivity have tended to ignore the mental illness factor which does need to be taken into consideration by analysts more rigorously in future. Consequently, the eruption of mental health issues may be contributing to the productivity paradox that has emerged in recent years. Fundamentally, the paper argues for the importance of determining the true measure of the present and likely future lost productivity attributable to mental illness given the substantial commitment of public and private resources as well as the tendency of analyses to-date to simultaneously underestimate the absolute magnitude of that loss and overestimate its impact relative to the size of the economy and to the influence of other drivers that may more readily boost productivity.
Public and private resources have been mobilized in the battle against mental illness with the express purpose, amongst others, of improving productivity but with less than entirely clear results so far. It also appears that a division of labor might be emerging between the public and private sectors as the public sector focuses on treating those with mental illness while the private sector tends to concentrate its efforts on protecting and enhancing the well-being of the remaining, mentally healthy work force.
Read full paper here
About Richard Rémillard
Richard Rémillard is President of Rémillard Consulting Group (RCG), a unique, Ottawa-based, bilingual consulting firm specializing in providing private sector, government & trade association clients with creative, research-grounded solutions to business issues and public policies involving the Canadian financial services industry. For more information: firstname.lastname@example.org
Disclaimer: The views expressed herein are those of the authors; they do not necessarily reflect the views of Private Capital Journal and CPE Media & Data Company.